Comments on: I still luvs him…

By: Pwah

Pwah — Sat, 19 Jun 2010 21:06:49 +0000

You, miss/mister, never saw the Dog whisperer

By: earthdiva

earthdiva — Sat, 28 Mar 2009 14:10:56 +0000

Hoomin babeh not in daynjur. Goggeh kleerley LUVS bebeh an pertecks it. Iz amayzing hao lil teh babeh iz or hao jumbo da goggeh iz. Luks laik goggeh adoors bebeh – iz sens no daynjur hear.

By: Amber

Amber — Mon, 19 Jan 2009 06:52:25 +0000

It’s probably just for a quick pic, I see a human arm under the baby so it’s not like they just let the dog lay on the baby unsupervised for a long period of time.

By: Jenni

Jenni — Sat, 22 Nov 2008 15:06:30 +0000

AWWWW….toooo cute!

By: C

Mon, 10 Nov 2008 13:02:25 +0000

Yeah, sorry, I agree – this photo gives me the fear! Dogs can turn at any moment, whether you want to believe it or not. Just because they have never bitten anyone doesn’t mean they never will.

And yes, anyone who has a baby or small child should be aware all the time about their child being left within mauling distance of the dog – I think that’s called good parenting!

By: Carla

Carla — Thu, 06 Nov 2008 02:14:49 +0000

Pfft I love this
My friend has a huge dog wich has never hurt either of her twin girls – he even drags there blankets up over them if he thinks they may be cold…so adorable! theres nothing negligent about this >_o

By: S

Thu, 30 Oct 2008 05:52:11 +0000

But when that dog gets startled by that loud, squealy baby under her muzzle, she might bite. Not because she’s a mean dog, just cos that’s what startled dogs do to defend themselves. (I think, not trying to be a troll… )

Maybe Dog is very used to the weird intervals that the “ugly puppeh” cries. Or maybe Dog doesn’t hear very well…. I dunno.

I trust that people know what they’re doing with their own kids/dogs.

It is a really adorable photo.

By: karenh831

karenh831 — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 09:18:59 +0000

that would mean that anyone with a dog larger than their child should be worried all the time? if the dog has never bit anyone, I dont see the negligent part you speak of……….

By: Jay

Jay — Sun, 26 Oct 2008 03:44:25 +0000

I don’t see it as endangerment. The dog is not laying on the baby, he just has a leg draped over it. Further, since a picture is being taken, they’re obviously not unsupervised.

Having said that … Adorable picture!

By: Nana

Nana — Sun, 26 Oct 2008 02:23:18 +0000

*snerk*

By: Z

Sat, 25 Oct 2008 19:37:52 +0000

7/10. Good troll attempt, but too smarmy.

By: Jane

Jane — Sat, 25 Oct 2008 19:36:25 +0000

yeah, I agree…little bit worrisome.

By: D.R.

D.R. — Sat, 25 Oct 2008 19:34:03 +0000

Mmmmwah, I gives u good luck smooch befoar I goes to sleepy dreemland.

By: reen

reen — Sat, 25 Oct 2008 17:44:27 +0000

Wow, does no one else see this as child endangerment? Letting a fifty pound dog “snuggle” with a 10 pound infant seems like negligent parenting to me.

By: bluesfan473

bluesfan473 — Sat, 25 Oct 2008 17:05:07 +0000

de amount uv drool awn de hed eekwils de amount uv luv ai haz fer dis bebeh

By: MishMel

MishMel — Sat, 25 Oct 2008 14:11:52 +0000

Here here! I concur!!

By: vangie

vangie — Sat, 25 Oct 2008 04:15:03 +0000

Googies see beyootie with teh heart not eyes. Googies see trooth.

By: Brandonha

Brandonha — Sat, 25 Oct 2008 02:26:58 +0000

dunt hold bees dey sting

By: Cowdogwah

Cowdogwah — Sat, 25 Oct 2008 01:10:15 +0000

Woodchuck,

U speeks da sooth. Evereewun iz byootifull 2 da mamma.

By: woodchuck

woodchuck — Sat, 25 Oct 2008 00:15:59 +0000

Byootee iz in teh eye uv teh beholdr.